Advocacy Alert: Let’s Answer LePage’s Attack on LEED! Updated 12/21/11 and 1/10/12
We were surprised and dismayed to learn of Governor LePage’s recent Order Regarding the Use of Green Building Standards in State Buildings which effectively bans the use of the LEED green building rating system, the most robust third-party verification program for sustainable design and construction, in state funded buildings. This is a significant loss for the State of Maine as LEED is a key tool to support the greening of the built environment and prioritizes the local economy.
Local materials and resources are a focal point of LEED. Any product, including wood, resourced from within 500 miles of a project receives credit towards LEED certification. This credit (MR 5), offering up to three points (including an Innovation in Design point for exemplary performance), is achieved by almost 90% of all LEED certified commercial projects. Achievement of these regional materials credits supports local economies. It is a direct blow to Maine businesses and their products to undermine a rating system that has successfully promoted the use of local and regional materials.
USGBC Market Brief – Materials and Resources in the LEED Rating System
We want to hear from you! What local/regional materials have you used on LEED projects? Each selection represents a contribution to the local economy. We’d like to show Governor LePage the value of LEED for our local economy. Thank you!
USGBC Policy Brief – Local Resources Eligible for MR 5
Motivated by energy savings, a commitment to the local economy, stewardship of Maine’s natural resources and occupant health private companies and institutions – L.L. Bean, Hannaford, Poland Spring, PowerPay, Gorham Savings Bank, Colby College, and Bowdoin College among many others – have chosen LEED and the reliability that its third party verification provides. It is incongruous and short-sighted to deny state buildings this same positive choice and outcome.
USGBC Market Brief – Maine Green Building Market Activity
The private sector and, historically, Maine state government (there are currently 12 LEED registered and certified buildings owned or occupied by state government) have embraced what LEED provides in ways no other rating system does: third party verification, demonstrated reduced energy use, thousands of gallons of water saved, the demonstrated positive impacts on human health, the tons of carbon dioxide emissions avoided.
It appears that an out-of-state interest has gotten to the highest office in the state and convinced them to walk away from the world’s preeminent green building rating system that consistently delivers immediate and measureable results.
December 21, 2011
Update:
Thank you for your informative responses to the Advocacy Alert we issued on this important topic last Friday. We have received excellent data which we can share with the LePage administration that shows how, as Chapter Member and LEED Certified Home owner Susan Gilpin put it, “LEED motivated us to look harder to find local materials. LEED is good for Maine businesses.”
We are happy to answer your questions regarding how, exactly, the Executive Order as written bans LEED. True, the ban on LEED is implied, rather than explicit. But, that’s exactly what the Order does. The Order states that: The design, construction, operation and maintenance of any new or expanded state building shall incorporate Green Building” standards that give certification credits equally to forest products grown, manufactured, and certified under the Sustainable Forestry Initiative, Forest Stewardship Council, American Tree Farm System and Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification systems. The certified wood credit included in the LEED rating system (one point out of 100) recognizes ONLY Forest Stewardship Council certification. Therefore, LEED is wholly excluded.
For those of you interested in learning more about the history of wood certification and about other environmental groups’ reactions to this Order, we are pleased to provide the documents linked below.
Environmental Groups Rally Around USGBC in Maine
Thank you, again, for your advocacy on this important issue. It’s important to reinstate LEED as the green building standard applied to state funded buildings in Maine.
January 10, 2012
Update:
As architects, engineers, designers, planners, contractors, manufacturers, building owners, operators, and investors, we ask that you consider the impacts of your decision on our industries. Professionals who work within Maine’s green building industry help generate $5 billion in annual revenue and more than 60,000 jobs. We hope the state does not walk away from this industry and community.
The progress we have made in healthy, high-performance buildings is tremendous. 1.6 million square feet of building space in Maine is certified to LEED and the state ranks 12th in green buildings on a per capita basis. In large part, this is due to our understanding and familiarity with the LEED rating system. These buildings demonstrate reduced energy use, thousands of gallons of water saved, positive impacts on human health, and literally tons of waste diverted from the landfill. The state contributes to some of these benefits and shares some of these savings through 12 LEED certified buildings that it owns or occupies.
The Executive Order was based on incorrect information; that LEED does not encourage the use of local resources and materials. All local products, including wood, manufactured within 500 miles of the project receive credit. We take full advantage of local materials in our LEED projects, and so do 90 percent of all LEED certified commercial projects nationwide.
The dispute over forestry certifications is a distraction from the real progress being made within our industries. The Maine green building industry excels at more than material selection. We plan, design, build, supply, maintain, operate and invest in buildings and neighborhoods that Mainers want to buy. We employ tens of thousands. We are the green building industry which has been a bright spot in today’s down-economy. We’re changing the way we do business, and making Maine a better place to live – for today and for tomorrow.
As Maine’s green building leaders, we ask you to reconsider this decision to turn away from LEED in capital projects. Our industry can be a positive economic force by completing building projects that save taxpayer money and inspire further innovation in the emerging 21st Century economy. Please rescind your recent Executive Order (#27 FY 11/12) and return Maine to the green building leadership position it deserves.
Sincerely,
Maine’s Green Building Leaders









